http://www.gaiser.org/knitblog/2003/08/24/scarf-progress/ whatever interests me this week.... Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:06:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3 http://www.gaiser.org/knitblog/2003/08/24/scarf-progress/#comment-539 Johanna Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://www.gaiser.org/knitblog/2003/08/24/scarf-progress/#comment-539 Both are looking great. Do you think that the DNA scarf will be too long? Would four repeats be better than five maybe? (I love that you are doing this before I do so that I can learn from you!) Both are looking great. Do you think that the DNA scarf will be too long? Would four repeats be better than five maybe? (I love that you are doing this before I do so that I can learn from you!)

]]> http://www.gaiser.org/knitblog/2003/08/24/scarf-progress/#comment-540 Jerry Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000 http://www.gaiser.org/knitblog/2003/08/24/scarf-progress/#comment-540 Hmm?? What is too long? It appears it's going to be long than a *standard* length scarf (whatever that means), but I believe that the complete 5 repeats were meant to be a correct representation of the complete DNA double helix. If you haven't already, take a look at <a href="http://noodle.pds.k12.nj.us/june/DNAScarf2.html">this link</a> for a picture of the completed scarf and the original recipient. Long but probably not too long. Hmm?? What is too long? It appears it’s going to be long than a *standard* length scarf (whatever that means), but I believe that the complete 5 repeats were meant to be a correct representation of the complete DNA double helix. If you haven’t already, take a look at this link
for a picture of the completed scarf and the original recipient. Long but probably not too long.

]]>